Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38980372›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Exploring functional conservation in silico: a new machine learning approach to RNA-editing.

Michał Zawisza-Álvarez, Jesús Peñuela-Melero, Esteban Vegas, Ferran Reverter, Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez, Carlos Herrera-Úbeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michał Zawisza-ÁlvarezDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Digonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús Peñuela-MeleroDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Digonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Esteban VegasDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Digonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Ferran ReverterDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Digonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Garcia-FernàndezDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Digonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Herrera-ÚbedaDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Digonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-9470

Funding

AGAUR 2021-SGR00372-GRCFPUMinisterio de Educación y Ciencia BFU2017-86152-PSpanish Ministerio de Universidades
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 50 years ago, molecular biology opened the path to understand changes in forms, adaptations, complexity, or the basis of human diseases through myriads of reports on gene birth, gene duplication, gene expression regulation, and splicing regulation, among other relevant mechanisms behind gene function. Here, with the advent of big data and artificial intelligence (AI), we focus on an elusive and intriguing mechanism of gene function regulation, RNA editing, in which a single nucleotide from an RNA molecule is changed, with a remarkable impact in the increase of the complexity of the transcriptome and proteome. We present a new generation approach to assess the functional conservation of the RNA-editing targeting mechanism using two AI learning algorithms, random forest (RF) and bidirectional long short-term memory (biLSTM) neural networks with an attention layer. These algorithms, combined with RNA-editing data coming from databases and variant calling from same-individual RNA and DNA-seq experiments from different species, allowed us to predict RNA-editing events using both primary sequence and secondary structure. Then, we devised a method for assessing conservation or divergence in the molecular mechanisms of editing completely in silico: the cross-testing analysis. This novel method not only helps to understand the conservation of the editing mechanism through evolution but could set the basis for achieving a better understanding of the adenosine-targeting mechanism in other fields.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRNA EditingAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRNARNAA-to-I editingdeep learningevolutionmachine learningRNA modification

Identifiers

PMID38980372
PMCPMC11232462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.