ReviewMedical molecular morphology2024
Liver fibrosis analysis using digital pathology.
Review in Medical molecular morphology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex disparities in primary biliary cholangitis: insights from a Japanese multicentre cohort.Medical molecular morphology · 2026Article
- Mechanobiological feedback loops and quantitative decision thresholds in organ fibrosis: Translational principles for antifibrotic therapy.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2026Review
- Hepatocarcinogenesis prediction by liver fibrosis patterns in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease biopsies.Medical molecular morphology · 2026Article
- Automating liver biopsy segmentation with a robust, open-source tool for pathology research: the HOTSPoT model.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital pathology has enabled the noninvasive quantification of pathological parameters. In addition, the combination of digital pathology and artificial intelligence has enabled the analysis of a vast amount of information, leading to the sharing of much information and the elimination of knowledge gaps. Fibrosis, which reflects chronic inflammation, is the most important pathological parameter in chronic liver diseases, such as viral hepatitis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. It has been reported that the quantitative evaluation of various fibrotic parameters by digital pathology can predict the prognosis of liver disease and hepatocarcinogenesis. Liver fibrosis evaluation methods include 1 fiber quantification, 2 elastin and collagen quantification, 3 s harmonic generation/two photon excitation fluorescence (SHG/TPE) microscopy, and 4 Fibronest™.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38980407What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.