ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024
Race as a Risk Marker, Not a Risk Factor: Revising Race-Based Algorithms to Protect Racially Oppressed Patients.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraskeletal Variation in Cortical Bone Quantity in a Medieval Italian Sample: A Multivariate Exploratory Approach.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Article
- Reevaluating the Use of Race/Ethnicity in the MESA Risk Score.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- The Extent Of Gender/Sex Variables Included In Clinical Algorithms Across Medical Specialties.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2026Article
- Barriers to healthcare for racialised populations in Europe: a scoping review of reviews.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- How I Teach Racial Categorization in Reference Equations Used to Interpret Spirometry.ATS scholar · 2025Article
- Neighborhood Influences on Cardiovascular Health: A Concept Mapping Study With Young Black Men Living in Southern Black Communities.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging consensus in the medical and public health spheres encourages removing race and ethnicity from algorithms used in clinical decision-making. Although clinical algorithms remain appealing given their promise to lighten the cognitive load of medical practice and save time for providers, they risk exacerbating existing health disparities. Race is a strong risk marker of health outcomes, yet it is not a risk factor. The use of race as a factor in medical algorithms suggests that the effect of race is intrinsic to the patient or that its effects can be distinct or separated from other social and environmental variables. By contrast, incisive public health analysis coupled with a race-conscious perspective recognizes that race serves as a marker of countless other dynamic variables and that structural racism, rather than race, compromises the health of racially oppressed individuals. This perspective offers a historical and theoretical context for the current debates regarding the use of race in clinical algorithms, clinical and epidemiologic perspectives on "risk," and future directions for research and policy interventions that combat color-evasive racism and follow the principles of race-conscious medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.