Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38982026›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience bulletin2024

Neurobiology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from Genes to Circuits: Insights from Animal Models.

Ying-Dan Zhang, Dong-Dong Shi, Zhen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying-Dan ZhangShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6598-5117
Dong-Dong ShiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China. laural.dong.shi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-7664
Zhen WangShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China. wangzhen@smhc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-5314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic, severe psychiatric disorder that has been ranked by the World Health Organization as one of the leading causes of illness-related disability, and first-line interventions are limited in efficacy and have side-effect issues. However, the exact pathophysiology underlying this complex, heterogeneous disorder remains unknown. This scenario is now rapidly changing due to the advancement of powerful technologies that can be used to verify the function of the specific gene and dissect the neural circuits underlying the neurobiology of OCD in rodents. Genetic and circuit-specific manipulation in rodents has provided important insights into the neurobiology of OCD by identifying the molecular, cellular, and circuit events that induce OCD-like behaviors. This review will highlight recent progress specifically toward classic genetic animal models and advanced neural circuit findings, which provide theoretical evidence for targeted intervention on specific molecular, cellular, and neural circuit events.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalObsessive-Compulsive DisorderAnimalsBrainHumansAnimal modelsCircuitsGenesNeurobiologyObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)

Identifiers

PMID38982026
PMCPMC11625044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.