Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38984473›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2024

The efficacy of topical oxygen therapy for wound healing: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Indri Lakhsmi Putri, Agnesia Alyssa, Imaniar Fitri Aisyah, Anak Agung Istri Yulan Permatasari, Rachmaniar Pramanasari, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Indri Lakhsmi PutriDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-6496
Agnesia AlyssaPlastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Unit, Airlangga University Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4890-3798
Imaniar Fitri AisyahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7209-6206
Anak Agung Istri Yulan PermatasariDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Unit, Bali Mandara Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7582-1000
Rachmaniar PramanasariPlastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Unit, Airlangga University Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5374-5645
Citrawati Dyah Kencono WunguDepartment of Physiology and Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5180-957X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In preclinical studies, topical oxygen treatment (TOT) was shown to enhance wound healing by applying supplemental oxygen topically to the surface of a moist wound at normobaric conditions. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a thorough evaluation of published RCTs and observational studies that compare supplemental TOT with standard wound care. A total of 1077 studies were obtained from a variety of databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trial Registers, and Preprints.org. The Jadad scale was employed to assess the reliability of RCT studies, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was employed to assess the quality of observational studies. Seven RCT studies (n = 692) and two controlled observational studies (n = 111) were analysed. The rate of healed wounds was 25.8% in the control group and 43.25% in the adjuvant TOT group, which shows the use of TOT significantly increased the number of healed wounds (RR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.18-2.64; p = 0.005). A significant decrease in the percentage of wound area was found in the TOT group in RCT studies (mean difference = 15.64; 95% CI 5.22-26.06; p = 0.003). In observational studies, the rate of healed wounds was 37.5% in the standard care group and 80.95% in the adjuvant TOT group, which shows a significant increase in the number of healed wounds in the adjuvant TOT group (RR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.46-3.15; p < 0.00001). Topical oxygen therapy is considered a great adjuvant therapy for chronic wound healing, particularly wounds with vascular compromise such as diabetic ulcers and pressure ulcers. Further studies on this topic are still needed as there are a lot of potential uses for this technology in various types of wounds.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWound HealingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenTreatment OutcomeWounds and InjuriesOxygenchronic woundmedical caretopical oxygen therapywound healing

Identifiers

PMID38984473
PMCPMC11234139

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.