Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985896›Full record

ReviewInvestigative radiology2025

Advancing Medical Imaging Research Through Standardization: The Path to Rapid Development, Rigorous Validation, and Robust Reproducibility.

Kyulee Jeon, Woo Yeon Park, Charles E Kahn, Paul Nagy, Seng Chan You, Soon Ho Yoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kyulee JeonFrom the Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea (K.J., S.C.Y.); Institution for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea (K.J., S.C.Y.); Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (W.Y.P., P.N.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (C.E.K.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.Y.).
Woo Yeon Park
Charles E Kahn
Paul Nagy
Seng Chan You

Funding

Johns Hopkins Training Program in Biomedical Informatics and Data ScienceT15LM013979 · NLM · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHRISTOPHER G CHUTE, Hadi Kharrazi · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM013979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractArtificial intelligence (AI) has made significant advances in radiology. Nonetheless, challenges in AI development, validation, and reproducibility persist, primarily due to the lack of high-quality, large-scale, standardized data across the world. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive standardization of medical imaging data and seamless integration with structured medical data.Developed by the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics community, the OMOP Common Data Model enables large-scale international collaborations with structured medical data. It ensures syntactic and semantic interoperability, while supporting the privacy-protected distribution of research across borders. The recently proposed Medical Imaging Common Data Model is designed to encompass all DICOM-formatted medical imaging data and integrate imaging-derived features with clinical data, ensuring their provenance.The harmonization of medical imaging data and its seamless integration with structured clinical data at a global scale will pave the way for advanced AI research in radiology. This standardization will enable federated learning, ensuring privacy-preserving collaboration across institutions and promoting equitable AI through the inclusion of diverse patient populations. Moreover, it will facilitate the development of foundation models trained on large-scale, multimodal datasets, serving as powerful starting points for specialized AI applications. Objective and transparent algorithm validation on a standardized data infrastructure will enhance reproducibility and interoperability of AI systems, driving innovation and reliability in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingBiomedical ResearchHumansRadiology Information SystemsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38985896
PMCPMC13176031

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.