ReviewInvestigative radiology2025
Advancing Medical Imaging Research Through Standardization: The Path to Rapid Development, Rigorous Validation, and Robust Reproducibility.
Review in Investigative radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance comparison and future perspectives of deep learning and classical machine learning in bone tumor applications: a systematic review (2019-2025).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Applications and challenges of biomarker-based predictive models in proactive health management.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Radiology research platform: automating multicenter radiological research workflows using a cloud-native platform.European radiology · 2026Article
- Ethical Considerations in Patient Privacy and Data Handling for AI in Cardiovascular Imaging and Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Data harmonization processes of cancer data into the observational medical outcomes partnership common data model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A framework for a national cancer imaging repository in Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma, from imaging, molecular biomarkers to multimodal AI: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Commercial AI platforms improve reproducibility but fail to meet clinical precision thresholds for intracranial aneurysm measurement: implications for serial surveillance.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Integrating medical imaging datasets with blockchain wallets: A case study on ARDS-COVID19 patients.PloS one · 2026Article
- Instrumentation Digital Twins in PET and SPECT Imaging: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in medical imaging for tumor diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive approach.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Risk Factors and Prognostic Models in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Insights From ASPECTS-Net Water Uptake.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Standardization and Interoperability: Federated Learning's Impact on EHR Systems and Health Informatics.Advances in health information science and practice · 2025Article
- Editorial: Women in radiology: neuroimaging and neurotechnology.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Applications of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma B Cells.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractArtificial intelligence (AI) has made significant advances in radiology. Nonetheless, challenges in AI development, validation, and reproducibility persist, primarily due to the lack of high-quality, large-scale, standardized data across the world. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive standardization of medical imaging data and seamless integration with structured medical data.Developed by the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics community, the OMOP Common Data Model enables large-scale international collaborations with structured medical data. It ensures syntactic and semantic interoperability, while supporting the privacy-protected distribution of research across borders. The recently proposed Medical Imaging Common Data Model is designed to encompass all DICOM-formatted medical imaging data and integrate imaging-derived features with clinical data, ensuring their provenance.The harmonization of medical imaging data and its seamless integration with structured clinical data at a global scale will pave the way for advanced AI research in radiology. This standardization will enable federated learning, ensuring privacy-preserving collaboration across institutions and promoting equitable AI through the inclusion of diverse patient populations. Moreover, it will facilitate the development of foundation models trained on large-scale, multimodal datasets, serving as powerful starting points for specialized AI applications. Objective and transparent algorithm validation on a standardized data infrastructure will enhance reproducibility and interoperability of AI systems, driving innovation and reliability in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.