Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987436›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2025

Isolation and characterisation of two epithelial-like cell lines from the gills of Chrysophrys auratus (Australasian snapper) and Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Chinook salmon) and their use in aquatic toxicology.

Björn Böhmert, Gavril L W Chong, Kim Lo, Michael Algie, Damon Colbert, Melissa D Jordan, Gabriella Stuart, Lyn M Wise, Lucy E J Lee, Niels C Bols and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Improve your success with fish cell lines-small things that matter.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Björn Böhmert *The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Nelson Research Centre, 293 Akersten Street, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand.
Gavril L W Chong *The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Nelson Research Centre, 293 Akersten Street, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand.
Kim LoThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Mt Albert Research Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Michael AlgieThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Nelson Research Centre, 293 Akersten Street, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand.
Damon ColbertThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Mt Albert Research Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Melissa D JordanThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Mt Albert Research Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Gabriella StuartDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lyn M WiseDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lucy E J LeeFaculty of Science, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC, V2S 7M8, Canada.
Niels C BolsDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Georgina C DowdThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Nelson Research Centre, 293 Akersten Street, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand. Georgina.Dowd@plantandfood.co.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-0834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro gill models are becoming increasingly important in aquatic toxicology, yet the fish gill invitrome is underrepresented, encompassing approximately 0.1% of extant species. Here, we describe the establishment and characterisation of two gill-derived, epithelial-like cell lines isolated from fish species of significant importance to New Zealand: Chrysophrys auratus (Australasian snapper) and Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Chinook salmon). Designated CAgill1PFR (Chrysophrys auratus, gill 1, Plant & Food Research) and OTgill1PFR (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, gill 1, Plant & Food Research), these cell lines have each been passaged greater than each 70 times over several years and are considered spontaneously immortalised. Both cell lines required serum for growth and exhibited differential responses to basal media formulations. CAgill1PFR was sensitive to low temperatures (4 °C) but replicated at high temperatures (30 °C), whereas OTgill1PFR was sensitive to high temperatures but remained viable at low temperatures, mirroring the natural environment of their host species. Immunostaining revealed expression of epithelial cell markers cytokeratin and E-cadherin, alongside positivity for the mesenchymal cell marker, vimentin. CAgill1PFR was more sensitive to the environmental toxin 3,4 dichloroaniline than OTgill1PFR through measurements of metabolic activity, membrane integrity, and lysosomal function. Furthermore, CAgill1PFR produced less CYP1A activity, indicative of ongoing biotransformation processes, in response to beta-naphthoflavone than OTgill1PFR. These cell lines expand the toolbox of resources and emphasise the need for species-specific aquatic toxicology research.

Indexed as

Epithelial CellsGillsOncorhynchusPerciformesAnimalsCell Line3,4 DCAAustralasian snapperChinook salmonEpithelialERODToxicology

Identifiers

PMID38987436
PMCPMC12246032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.