ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Association between type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake frequency, age at menarche, and gallbladder cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk factors for cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy of the digestive tract, characterized by a remarkably poor prognosis. Currently, there is a controversy on the relationship between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and GBC. Additionally, no definitive conclusions were established regarding the causal relationships between alcohol intake frequency (AIF), age at menarche (AAM) and GBC. The objective of this study was to elucidate the causal association between T2D, AIF, AAM, and GBC. Methods: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with exposures and outcomes were sourced from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) database. Specifically, the data of GBC comprised 907 East Asians (pathological results of all cases were registered into Biobank Japan) and 425,707 SNPs; T2D comprised 655,666 Europeans with 5,030,727 SNPs; AIF comprised 462,346 Europeans and 9,851,867 SNPs; AAM comprised 243,944 Europeans and 9,851,867 SNPs. The measurement of exposure traits is collected uniformly from the UK Biobank (UKB) database and presented in the form of standard deviation (SD) or the logarithmic form of the odds ratio (logOR). We employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to discern the causalities between T2D, AIF, AAM, and GBC. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify and address potential heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and outliers. Results: Our findings indicated that T2D reduced GBC risk [odds ratio (OR) =0.044; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004-0.55; P=0.015, inverse variance-weighted (IVW)]. However, no causal relationship was observed between AIF (OR =0.158; 95% CI: 5.33E-05 to 466.84; P=0.65, IVW), AAM (OR =0.19; 95% CI: 0.0003-140.34; P=0.62, IVW), and GBC. Sensitivity analysis revealed no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity, or outliers, suggesting the robustness and reliability of our conclusions. Conclusions: T2D emerged as a potentially protective factor against GBC, whereas neither AIF nor AAM demonstrated a causal relationship with GBC risk. Regulation of glucose metabolism may be one of the methods for preventing GBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.