Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993246›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of oncology2024

Untapped Potential of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors: Lessons Learned From the Real-World Clinical Homologous Recombination Repair Mutation Testing.

Alexandra Lebedeva, Egor Veselovsky, Alexandra Kavun, Ekaterina Belova, Tatiana Grigoreva, Pavel Orlov, Anna Subbotovskaya, Maksim Shipunov, Oleg Mashkov, Fanil Bilalov and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alexandra LebedevaOncoAtlas LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Egor VeselovskyOncoAtlas LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Alexandra KavunOncoAtlas LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina BelovaOncoAtlas LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana GrigorevaOncoAtlas LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Pavel OrlovThe Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine (NIIECM FRC FTM), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anna SubbotovskayaThe Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine (NIIECM FRC FTM), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Maksim ShipunovThe Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine (NIIECM FRC FTM), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Oleg MashkovState Budgetary Institution of Healthcare Republican Medical Genetic Center, Ufa, Russia.
Fanil BilalovState Budgetary Institution of Healthcare Republican Medical Genetic Center, Ufa, Russia.
Peter ShatalovNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Andrey KaprinNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Peter ShegaiNational Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Zhan DiuzhevGEMOTEST Laboratory LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Ochir MigiaevGEMOTEST Laboratory LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Natalya VytnovaGEMOTEST Laboratory LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Vladislav MileykoOncoAtlas LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Maxim IvanovOncoAtlas LLC, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-0129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) mutations is pivotal to assess individual risk, to proact preventive measures in healthy carriers and to tailor treatments for cancer patients. Increasing prominence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with remarkable impact on molecular-selected patient survival across diverse nosologies, ingrains testing for BRCA genes and beyond in clinical practice. Nevertheless, testing strategies remain a question of debate. While several pathogenic BRCA1/2 gene variants have been described as founder pathogenic mutations frequently found in patients from Russia, other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes have not been sufficiently explored. In this study, we present real-world data of routine HRR gene testing in Russia. Methods: We evaluated clinical and sequencing data from cancer patients who had germline/somatic next-generation sequencing (NGS) HRR gene testing in Russia (BRCA1/2/ATM/CHEK2, or 15 HRR genes). The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the frequency of BRCA1/2 and non-BRCA gene mutations in real-world unselected patients from Russia, and to determine whether testing beyond BRCA1/2 is feasible. Results: Data of 2,032 patients were collected from February 2021 to February 2023. Most had breast (n = 715, 35.2%), ovarian (n = 259, 12.7%), pancreatic (n = 85, 4.2%), or prostate cancer (n = 58, 2.9%). We observed 586 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and 372 deleterious variants (DVs) across 487 patients, with 17.6% HRR-mutation positivity. HRR testing identified 120 (11.8%) BRCA1/2-positive, and 172 (16.9%) HRR-positive patients. With 51 DVs identified in 242 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), testing for variant origin clarification was required in one case (0.4%). Most BRCA1/2 germline variants were DV (121 DVs, 26 VUS); in non-BRCA1/2 genes, VUS were ubiquitous (53 DVs, 132 VUS). Conclusions: Our study represents one of the first reports about the incidence of DV and VUS in HRR genes, including genes beyond BRCA1/2, identified in cancer patients from Russia, assessed by NGS.

Indexed as

Founder mutationsHereditary breast and ovarian cancerHomologous recombination repairHRR gene mutationsNext-generation sequencingPancreatic cancerPARP inhibitorsProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID38993246
PMCPMC11236374

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.