ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Pediatric Hypertension Screening in an Academic Primary Care Setting.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blood pressure measurement practices in children and adolescents within primary care setting.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guidelines for screening and managing high blood pressure (BP) is low. This team sought to improve recognition and documentation of relevant diagnoses in patients aged 13-20 years who presented to general pediatric clinics. Methods: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of office visits for patients ages 13-20 with a BP ≥ 120/80 with a visit or problem list diagnosis of hypertension or elevated BP. Secondary measures included (1) the proportion of patients who had their BP measured in the right arm, (2) the proportion of patients who had a mid-arm circumference measurement recorded, and (3) the proportion of patients who had a second BP reading measured at the visit. Interventions addressed key drivers for evidence-based high BP screening: standard BP measurement, electronic health record clinical decision support, and clinical pathway adoption. Data were collected over a twenty-seven-month period and plotted using the Laney p' chart. Results: Provider documentation of elevated BP or hypertension improved from a baseline mean of 24% in April 2020 through January 2022 to 41% in February 2021 through June 2022. All secondary outcome measures also demonstrated significant improvement. Conclusions: This project demonstrates the feasibility of improving adherence to best practices of BP measurement in primary care clinics through education, acquisition of resources, and implementation of electronic health record flags for abnormal values.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.