Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993485›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024

Deep Learning-Based Prediction Modeling of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Liver Transplantation.

Ahmed Abdelhameed, Harpreet Bhangu, Jingna Feng, Fang Li, Xinyue Hu, Parag Patel, Liu Yang, Cui Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emerging applications of traditional and generative artificial intelligence in liver transplantation.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed AbdelhameedMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-9970-2517
Harpreet BhanguMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Jingna FengMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Fang LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Xinyue HuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Parag PatelMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Liu YangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Cui TaoMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics (A.A., J.F., F.L., X.H., C.T.) and Department of Transplantation (H.B., P.P., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

Funding

ACTS (AD Clinical Trial Simulation): Developing Advanced Informatics Approaches for an Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial Simulation SystemR01AG084236 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Jiang Bian, Cui Tao · 2023 to 2026
$4.1M
An end-to-end informatics framework to study Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC)'s impact on Alzheimer's disease using harmonized electronic health recordsR01AG083039 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BIAN, JIANG, JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2023 to 2025
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083039NIA NIH HHS R01 AG084236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To validate deep learning models' ability to predict post-transplantation major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Patients and Methods: We used data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database to identify liver transplant recipients between January 2007 and March 2020. To predict post-transplantation MACE risk, we considered patients' demographics characteristics, diagnoses, medications, and procedural data recorded back to 3 years before the LT procedure date (index date). MACE is predicted using the bidirectional gated recurrent units (BiGRU) deep learning model in different prediction interval lengths up to 5 years after the index date. In total, 18,304 liver transplant recipients (mean age, 57.4 years [SD, 12.76]; 7158 [39.1%] women) were used to develop and test the deep learning model's performance against other baseline machine learning models. Models were optimized using 5-fold cross-validation on 80% of the cohort, and model performance was evaluated on the remaining 20% using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR). Results: Using different prediction intervals after the index date, the top-performing model was the deep learning model, BiGRU, and achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.841 (95% CI, 0.822-0.862) and AUC-PR of 0.578 (95% CI, 0.537-0.621) for a 30-day prediction interval after LT. Conclusion: Using longitudinal claims data, deep learning models can efficiently predict MACE after LT, assisting clinicians in identifying high-risk candidates for further risk stratification or other management strategies to improve transplant outcomes based on important features identified by the model.

Identifiers

PMID38993485
PMCPMC11238640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.