Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38995546›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Interpreting Gene Ontology Annotations Derived from Sequence Homology Methods.

Marc Feuermann, Pascale Gaudet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marc FeuermannSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4187-2863
Pascale GaudetSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland. Pascale.Gaudet@sib.swiss.ORCID 0000-0003-1813-6857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gene Ontology (GO) project describes the functions of the gene products of organisms from all kingdoms of life in a standardized way, enabling powerful analyses of experiments involving genome-wide analysis. The scientific literature is used to convert experimental results into GO annotations that systematically classify gene products' functions. However, to address the fact that only a minor fraction of all genes has been characterized experimentally, multiple predictive methods to assign GO annotations have been developed since the inception of GO. Sequence homologies between novel genes and genes with known functions help to approximate the roles of these non-characterized genes. Here we describe the main sequence homology methods to produce annotations: pairwise comparison (BLAST), protein profile models (InterPro), and phylogenetic-based annotation (PAINT). Some of these methods can be implemented with genome analysis pipelines (BLAST and InterPro2GO), while PAINT is curated by the GO consortium.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene OntologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationDatabases, GeneticHumansPhylogenySequence HomologySoftwareGain of functionGene ontologyHomology annotationLoss of functionPhylogenetic annotation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.