ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2024
Rational design of lipid nanoparticles: overcoming physiological barriers for selective intracellular mRNA delivery.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming hepatic tropism: Precision engineering of lipid nanoparticles for extrahepatic RNA delivery.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Low reactogenicity and high tumour antigen expression from mRNA-LNPs with membrane-destabilizing zwitterionic lipids.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- The current landscape of mRNA therapy and the strategies for mRNA purification and dsRNA removal.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated co-delivery of IL-33 mRNA and STING agonist modulates the breast cancer microenvironment and potentiates immunotherapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Advancements in Gene Delivery using Nucleic Acid Loaded Nanoparticles for Region Specific Delivery in Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Delivery of mRNA Therapeutics Beyond Infectious Diseases: Design Innovations and Applications in Oncology, Cardiovascular, and Rare Genetic Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeted Delivery of Nucleic Acid Therapeutics: Emerging Carriers and Applications in Common Metabolic and Inflammatory Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Replacing cholesterol and PEGylated lipids with zwitterionic ionizable lipids in LNPs for spleen-specific mRNA translation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Physiological Barriers to Nucleic Acid Therapeutics and Engineering Strategies for Lipid Nanoparticle Design, Optimization, and Clinical Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Decrypting the Immune Symphony for RNA Vaccines.Vaccines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review introduces the typical delivery process of messenger RNA (mRNA) nanomedicines and concludes that the delivery involves a at least four-step SCER cascade and that high efficiency at every step is critical to guarantee high overall therapeutic outcomes. This SCER cascade process includes selective organ-targeting delivery, cellular uptake, endosomal escape, and cytosolic mRNA release. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have emerged as a state-of-the-art vehicle for in vivo mRNA delivery. The review emphasizes the importance of LNPs in achieving selective, efficient, and safe mRNA delivery. The discussion then extends to the technical and clinical considerations of LNPs, detailing the roles of individual components in the SCER cascade process, especially ionizable lipids and helper phospholipids. The review aims to provide an updated overview of LNP-based mRNA delivery, outlining recent innovations and addressing challenges while exploring future developments for clinical translation over the next decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.