Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38998083›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Updates and Current Challenges in Reproductive Microbiome: A Comparative Analysis between Cows and Women.

Amanda Fonseca Zangirolamo, Anne Kemmer Souza, Deborah Nakayama Yokomizo, Ana Karolyne Alves Miguel, Márcio Carvalho da Costa, Amauri Alcindo Alfieri, Marcelo Marcondes Seneda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda Fonseca ZangirolamoNational Institute of Science and Technology for Dairy Production Chain (INCT-LEITE), Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2967-7528
Anne Kemmer SouzaLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil.
Deborah Nakayama YokomizoLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-4901
Ana Karolyne Alves MiguelLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-8833
Márcio Carvalho da CostaDépartement de Biomédecine Vétérinaire, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5067-7501
Amauri Alcindo AlfieriNational Institute of Science and Technology for Dairy Production Chain (INCT-LEITE), Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7024-4487
Marcelo Marcondes SenedaNational Institute of Science and Technology for Dairy Production Chain (INCT-LEITE), Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5097-5119

Funding

National Institute of Science and Technology for Dairy Production Chain INCT-LEITE 465725 2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota plays an important role in numerous physiological processes, pathogenesis, development, and metabolism in different animal species. In humans, several studies have demonstrated an association between the vaginal microbiota and fertility rates, and even success in assisted reproduction techniques. In the context of cattle reproduction, although few studies have addressed the microbiota in a healthy state (which is not associated with diseases that affect the reproductive tract of cows), changes in its composition also seem to influence fertility. This review aims to explain the importance of the reproductive microbiota in female bovines and what is available in the literature regarding its possible role in increasing fertility. What are the challenges involved in this process? Future perspectives on its use and manipulation as a selection or intervention tool. Will it be possible to one day extrapolate the findings to reality and apply them in the field? In short, understanding the role of the reproductive microbiota of female bovines can signal the prospect of increasing production, whether of milk or meat, from the same number of animals, as it can optimize reproductive efficiency and perhaps become an allied tool for the economic profitability and sustainability of livestock farming.

Indexed as

cattlemicrobiota manipulationreproductionuterine microbiotavaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID38998083
PMCPMC11240322

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.