Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38998097›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

The Welfare of Dogs as an Aspect of the Human-Dog Bond: A Scoping Review.

Peter Verbeek, Chase Alan Majure, Laura Quattrochi, Stephen James Turner

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter VerbeekDepartment of Anthropology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 402 10th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1241, USA.
Chase Alan MajureDepartment of Anthropology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 402 10th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1241, USA.
Laura QuattrochiDepartment of Anthropology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 402 10th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1241, USA.
Stephen James TurnerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 402 10th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1241, USA.

Funding

fee is waived by Animals as per email of Ms. Sandra Spatariu dated 10/4/23 waived
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The close bond that can exist between humans and their dogs is an important aspect of the evolutionary, economic, and social connections between the two species. There is a need for a better understanding of the place of the dog within the human-dog bond and on ways the human-dog bond affects dog welfare. We conducted a scoping review to investigate to what extent and in what ways dog welfare is addressed in the research literature on the human-dog bond. We identified 706 publications on the human-dog bond from across the globe that were published from 2012 to 2023. We found that 246 of these 706 publications had a focus on dog welfare. Our review showed that the interplay of characteristics and backgrounds of owners/handlers and their dogs was linked to dog welfare in multiple, both positive and negative, ways. Our review is limited by the fact that most of the research that we reviewed involved pet dogs and in majority came from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD) societies. There is a need for a better understanding of how the human-dog bond affects the welfare of working, assistance, and service dogs.

Indexed as

behaviordog welfarehuman–dog bond

Identifiers

PMID38998097
PMCPMC11240373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.