Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000401›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Modifications of Nanobubble Therapy for Cancer Treatment.

Katarzyna M Terlikowska, Bozena Dobrzycka, Slawomir J Terlikowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emerging Nanoplatforms are Effective Against Tumor Hypoxia.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna M TerlikowskaDepartment of Food Biotechnology, Medical University of Bialystok, Szpitalna 37 Street, 15-295 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7685-8976
Bozena DobrzyckaDepartment of Gynaecology and Practical Obstetrics, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 24A Street, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8992-707X
Slawomir J TerlikowskiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Maternity Care, Medical University of Bialystok, Szpitalna 37 Street, 15-295 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5091-026X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer development is related to genetic mutations in primary cells, where 5-10% of all cancers are derived from acquired genetic defects, most of which are a consequence of the environment and lifestyle. As it turns out, over half of cancer deaths are due to the generation of drug resistance. The local delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs may reduce their toxicity by increasing their therapeutic dose at targeted sites and by decreasing the plasma levels of circulating drugs. Nanobubbles have attracted much attention as an effective drug distribution system due to their non-invasiveness and targetability. This review aims to present the characteristics of nanobubble systems and their efficacy within the biomedical field with special emphasis on cancer treatment. In vivo and in vitro studies on cancer confirm nanobubbles' ability and good blood capillary perfusion; however, there is a need to define their safety and side effects in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesAntineoplastic Agentscancerdoxorubicinhematoporphyrin monomethyl etherlonidaminelow-intensity ultrasoundnanobubblespaclitaxelphotodynamic therapysiRNsonodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID39000401
PMCPMC11242568

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.