Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000503›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Navigating the Modern Landscape of Sepsis: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Jin Ho Jang, Eunjeong Choi, Taehwa Kim, Hye Ju Yeo, Doosoo Jeon, Yun Seong Kim, Woo Hyun Cho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Regulation of Protein Transport in Functionalized PET Nanopores.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jin Ho JangDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7001-4008
Eunjeong ChoiDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.
Taehwa KimDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-0261
Hye Ju YeoDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8403-5790
Doosoo JeonDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.
Yun Seong KimDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.
Woo Hyun ChoDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8299-8008

Funding

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI21C1074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis poses a significant threat to human health due to its high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methods for identifying sepsis or its causative organisms are time-consuming and contribute to a high mortality rate. Biomarkers have been developed to overcome these limitations and are currently used for sepsis diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and treatment response assessment. Over the past few decades, more than 250 biomarkers have been identified, a few of which have been used in clinical decision-making. Consistent with the limitations of diagnosing sepsis, there is currently no specific treatment for sepsis. Currently, the general treatment for sepsis is conservative and includes timely antibiotic use and hemodynamic support. When planning sepsis-specific treatment, it is important to select the most suitable patient, considering the heterogeneous nature of sepsis. This comprehensive review summarizes current and evolving biomarkers and therapeutic approaches for sepsis.

Indexed as

BiomarkersSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansPrognosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersbiomarkerdiagnosisimmunomodulationnovelsepsisseptic shocktreatment

Identifiers

PMID39000503
PMCPMC11242529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.