ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Releasing Dynamic of Serum ST2 and Calprotectin in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain Endothelial Soluble ST2 Production and Cerebral Edema in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Associations of Soluble Serum Stimulation-2 With Functional Outcomes and Death at 1 Year in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Correlation of serum calprotectin with outcome of acute cerebral infarction.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the releasing dynamics of serum ST2 and calprotectin in patients with acute IS. The study included acute IS patients (N = 20) with an NIH Stroke Scale score ≥8. Sampling was performed at seven time points: after admission (T0) and at the following 24 h consecutive intervals (T1-T6). Primary outcome at 90 days was evaluated using the modified Rankin scale: 0-2 for good and 3-6 for poor functional outcome. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality after 90 days. Fifteen patients had a poor outcome, and eight died. Results showed a statistically significant difference in ST2 concentrations between good and poor outcomes at T0 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.