ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Combining the Strengths of the Explainable Boosting Machine and Metabolomics Approaches for Biomarker Discovery in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Meta-Learning Ensemble Framework for Predicting Insulin Dose Adjustments in Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Machine Learning Approach with SHAP-Based Clinical Interpretability.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Accuracy is not enough: explainable boosting machine model and identification of candidate biomarkers for real-time sepsis risk assessment in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Interpretable Prediction of Myocardial Infarction Using Explainable Boosting Machines: A Biomarker-Based Machine Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), a common disease that can have serious consequences, occurs when myocardial blood flow stops due to occlusion of the coronary artery. Early and accurate prediction of AMI is critical for rapid prognosis and improved patient outcomes. Metabolomics, the study of small molecules within biological systems, is an effective tool used to discover biomarkers associated with many diseases. This study intended to construct a predictive model for AMI utilizing metabolomics data and an explainable machine learning approach called Explainable Boosting Machines (EBM). The EBM model was trained on a dataset of 102 prognostic metabolites gathered from 99 individuals, including 34 healthy controls and 65 AMI patients. After a comprehensive data preprocessing, 21 metabolites were determined as the candidate predictors to predict AMI. The EBM model displayed satisfactory performance in predicting AMI, with various classification performance metrics. The model's predictions were based on the combined effects of individual metabolites and their interactions. In this context, the results obtained in two different EBM modeling, including both only individual metabolite features and their interaction effects, were discussed. The most important predictors included creatinine, nicotinamide, and isocitrate. These metabolites are involved in different biological activities, such as energy metabolism, DNA repair, and cellular signaling. The results demonstrate the potential of the combination of metabolomics and the EBM model in constructing reliable and interpretable prediction outputs for AMI. The discussed metabolite biomarkers may assist in early diagnosis, risk assessment, and personalized treatment methods for AMI patients. This study successfully developed a pipeline incorporating extensive data preprocessing and the EBM model to identify potential metabolite biomarkers for predicting AMI. The EBM model, with its ability to incorporate interaction terms, demonstrated satisfactory classification performance and revealed significant metabolite interactions that could be valuable in assessing AMI risk. However, the results obtained from this study should be validated with studies to be carried out in larger and well-defined samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.