Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39004916›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Evaluation of maternal serum protein biomarkers in the prenatal evaluation of placenta accreta spectrum: A systematic scoping review.

Matthew Givens, Ivaila Valcheva, Brett D Einerson, Ewelina Rogozińska, Eric Jauniaux

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Maternal serum thrombospondin-4 levels in placenta accreta spectrum: A case-control study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Placenta accreta spectrum.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew GivensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Givens and Einerson), University of Utah Health (UUH), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Ivaila ValchevaEGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-0138
Brett D EinersonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Givens and Einerson), University of Utah Health (UUH), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Ewelina RogozińskaThe EVIdencE Synthesis and Methodology Group for Women's Health Research (EVIE), Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
Eric JauniauxEGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0925-7737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPlacenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is an increasingly commonly reported condition due to the continuous increase in the rate of cesarean deliveries (CD) worldwide; however, the prenatal screening for pregnant patients at risk of PAS at birth remains limited, in particular when imaging expertise is not available. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwo major electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) were searched electronically for articles published in English between October 1992 and January 2023 using combinations of the relevant medical subject heading terms and keywords. Two independent reviewers selected observational studies that provided data on one or more measurement of maternal blood-specific biomarker(s) during pregnancies with PAS at birth. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) was used to extract data and report results.

resultsOf the 441 reviewed articles, 29 met the inclusion criteria reporting on 34 different biomarkers. 14 studies were retrospective and 15 prospective overall including 18 251 participants. Six studies had a cohort design and the remaining a case-control design. Wide clinical heterogeneity was found in the included studies. In eight studies, the samples were obtained in the first trimester; in five, the samples were collected on hospital admission for delivery; and in the rest, the samples were collected during the second and/or third trimester.

conclusionsMeasurements of serum biomarkers, some of which have been or are still used in screening for other pregnancy complications, could contribute to the prenatal evaluation of patients at risk of PAS at delivery; however, important evidence gaps were identified for suitable cutoffs for most biomarkers, variability of gestational age at sampling and the potential overlap of the marker values with other placental-related complications of pregnancy.

Indexed as

BiomarkersPlacenta AccretaBlood ProteinsFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisBiomarkersBlood Proteinsmaternal serumplacenta accretaplacenta accreta spectrumplacenta previa accretaprotein biomarkersscreening

Identifiers

PMID39004916
PMCPMC11610010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.