ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Step Forward Cross Validation for Bioactivity Prediction: Out of Distribution Validation in Drug Discovery.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in machine learning methods for materials science have significantly enhanced accurate predictions of the properties of novel materials. Here, we explore whether these advances can be adapted to drug discovery by addressing the problem of prospective validation - the assessment of the performance of a method on out-of-distribution data. First, we tested whether k-fold n-step forward cross-validation could improve the accuracy of out-of-distribution small molecule bioactivity predictions. We found that it is more helpful than conventional random split cross-validation in describing the accuracy of a model in real-world drug discovery settings. We also analyzed discovery yield and novelty error, finding that these two metrics provide an understanding of the applicability domain of models and an assessment of their ability to predict molecules with desirable bioactivity compared to other small molecules. Based on these results, we recommend incorporating a k-fold n-step forward cross-validation and these metrics when building state-of-the-art models for bioactivity prediction in drug discovery.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.