ArticleACS omega2024
Integrated ML-Based Strategy Identifies Drug Repurposing for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of AI/ML in accelerating the development of pulmonary drug delivery system.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Antifibrotic Efficacy of Daclatasvir Against Pulmonary Fibrosis: Insights From Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, Dynamics, and Preclinical Evaluations.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Review
- Conjugated bile acids alleviate acute pancreatitis through inhibition of TGR5 and NLRP3 mediated inflammation.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affects an estimated global population of around 3 million individuals. IPF is a medical condition with an unknown cause characterized by the formation of scar tissue in the lungs, leading to progressive respiratory disease. Currently, there are only two FDA-approved small molecule drugs specifically for the treatment of IPF and this has created a demand for the rapid development of drugs for IPF treatment. Moreover, denovo drug development is time and cost-intensive with less than a 10% success rate. Drug repurposing currently is the most feasible option for rapidly making the drugs to market for a rare and sporadic disease. Normally, the repurposing of drugs begins with a screening of FDA-approved drugs using computational tools, which results in a low hit rate. Here, an integrated machine learning-based drug repurposing strategy is developed to significantly reduce the false positive outcomes by introducing the predock machine-learning-based predictions followed by literature and GSEA-assisted validation and drug pathway prediction. The developed strategy is deployed to 1480 FDA-approved drugs and to drugs currently in a clinical trial for IPF to screen them against "TGFB1", "TGFB2", "PDGFR-a", "SMAD-2/3", "FGF-2", and more proteins resulting in 247 total and 27 potentially repurposable drugs. The literature and GSEA validation suggested that 72 of 247 (29.14%) drugs have been tried for IPF, 13 of 247 (5.2%) drugs have already been used for lung fibrosis, and 20 of 247 (8%) drugs have been tested for other fibrotic conditions such as cystic fibrosis and renal fibrosis. Pathway prediction of the remaining 142 drugs was carried out resulting in 118 distinct pathways. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that 29 of 118 pathways were directly or indirectly involved in IPF and 11 of 29 pathways were directly involved. Moreover, 15 potential drug combinations are suggested for showing a strong synergistic effect in IPF. The drug repurposing strategy reported here will be useful for rapidly developing drugs for treating IPF and other related conditions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.