Evidence mapPaperPMID 39006159Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2024

Remote symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcome measures in outpatients with chronic kidney disease (PROKID): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority study.

Birgith Engelst Grove, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Frank Mose, Else Randers, Niels Henrik Hjollund, Per Ivarsen, Annette De Thurah

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03847766 (Tele Follow-up Using Patient-reported Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03847766 nacompletednot on this map

Tele Follow-up Using Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease - the PROKID Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2018 to 2023Enrolled152ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseasesArmsPRO-based follow-up, PRO-based telephone consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Birgith Engelst GroveAmbuFlex - Centre for Patient-reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3763-9911
Liv Marit Valen SchougaardAmbuFlex - Centre for Patient-reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Frank MoseDepartment of Renal Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-5814
Else RandersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Niels Henrik HjollundAmbuFlex - Centre for Patient-reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Per IvarsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Annette De ThurahDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0103-4328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is straining the capacity of outpatient clinics. Remote healthcare delivery might improve CKD follow-up compared with conventional face-to-face follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used to empower remote follow-up and patient engagement. The consequences of shifting from face-to-face follow-up to remote outpatient follow-up on kidney function, health resource utilisation and quality of life remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a multicentre pragmatic non-inferiority trial at three outpatient clinics in the Central Denmark Region. A total of 152 incident outpatients with CKD were randomised (1:1:1) to either PRO-based, PRO-telephone follow-up or standard of care (SoC). The primary outcome was the annual change in kidney function measured by the slope of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The non-inferiority margin was an eGFR of 2.85 ml/min/1.73 m Results: Mean eGFR slope differences between PRO-based and SoC were -0.97 ml/min/1.73 m Conclusion: Differences in the eGFR slope between groups were non-significant and results on non-inferiority were inconclusive. Thus, transitioning to remote PRO-based follow-up requires close monitoring of kidney function. Reducing patients' attendance in the outpatient clinic was possible without decreasing either quality of life or illness perception.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03847766.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseoutpatient carepatient-reported outcome measuresrandomized controlled trialremote symptom monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39006159
PMCPMC11240050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.