ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Learning carotid vessel wall segmentation in black-blood MRI using sparsely sampled cross-sections from 3D data.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carotid atherosclerotic lesion analysis in 3D based on distance encoding in mesh representation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Learning three-dimensional aortic root assessment based on sparse annotations.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Atherosclerosis of the carotid artery is a major risk factor for stroke. Quantitative assessment of the carotid vessel wall can be based on cross-sections of three-dimensional (3D) black-blood magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To increase reproducibility, a reliable automatic segmentation in these cross-sections is essential. Approach: We propose an automatic segmentation of the carotid artery in cross-sections perpendicular to the centerline to make the segmentation invariant to the image plane orientation and allow a correct assessment of the vessel wall thickness (VWT). We trained a residual U-Net on eight sparsely sampled cross-sections per carotid artery and evaluated if the model can segment areas that are not represented in the training data. We used 218 MRI datasets of 121 subjects that show hypertension and plaque in the ICA or CCA measuring Results: The model achieves a high mean Dice coefficient of 0.948/0.859 for the vessel's lumen/wall, a low mean Hausdorff distance of Conclusions: The proposed method can reduce the effort for carotid artery vessel wall assessment. Together with human supervision, it can be used for clinical applications, as it allows a reliable measurement of the VWT for different patient demographics and MRI acquisition settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.