ArticleCureus2024
The Impact of the Use of e-Partogram on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To overcome shortcomings of the paper partograph, enhance care during labor and delivery, improve record keeping, and help decision-making, several countries have focused on adopting low-cost digital applications. This scoping review highlights the usability and current status of the digital partogram in obstetric care. We conducted a thorough search involving the databases ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar for relevant studies from inception till September 2023 by using the keywords "partograph", "electronic", and "obstetric" as well as the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR". Based on the selection criteria, 25 studies exploring the application of electronic partographs (e-partographs) in obstetric care were included in the review. The majority of the studies examined the efficiency and reported the effectiveness of e-partographs in comparison to paper partographs. The e-partograph has also demonstrated a clear benefit in that the healthcare providers filled out the data, and a reminder mechanism was placed, which might help determine whether the labor process was normal or needed more care. Moreover, an e-partograph was simple to adopt and use for obstetric caregivers and had the potential to save time. To sum up, digital partograph produces superior results to paper partograph. The use of an e-partograph can keep deliveries on track while lowering the need for cesarean sections and prolonged labor. The e-partograph provides essential benefits to its users and also provides a warning system with audible and visual cues that might be utilized to detect difficulties during delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.