Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006629›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Therapeutic Potential of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Fracture Healing: A Comprehensive Review.

Prathamesh Kale, Sandeep Shrivastava, Prashanth Balusani, Aditya Pundkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Adjunctive therapies in geriatric ankle fracture patients].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Platelet-Rich Plasma: Are We Ahead of the Evidence?The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Avoiding Hallux Sesamoidectomy: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prathamesh KaleOrthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Sandeep ShrivastavaOrthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Prashanth BalusaniOrthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Aditya PundkarOrthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture healing is a dynamic process essential for the restoration of bone integrity and function. However, factors such as patient age, comorbidities, and the severity of the fracture can impede this process, leading to delayed healing or nonunion. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for enhancing fracture healing. PRP is an autologous blood product containing a concentrated mixture of platelets, growth factors, and cytokines known to promote tissue regeneration and repair. This comprehensive review provides an overview of the fracture healing process, emphasizing the importance of timely and efficient bone repair. We discuss the mechanisms underlying the purported efficacy of PRP in fracture healing, drawing upon both preclinical and clinical evidence. Preclinical studies in animal models have demonstrated the ability of PRP to accelerate fracture healing, stimulate osteogenesis, and enhance bone regeneration. Clinical studies have yielded mixed results, with some reporting positive outcomes in terms of accelerated healing and improved functional outcomes, while others have shown no significant benefits over standard treatments. Factors influencing the efficacy of PRP, such as timing of administration, PRP concentration, and patient-specific variables, are also examined. Furthermore, safety considerations and potential adverse effects associated with PRP therapy are discussed. Despite the promising preclinical findings, challenges remain in standardizing PRP formulations, optimizing administration protocols, and addressing unanswered questions regarding its long-term efficacy and safety. This review aims to provide insights into the therapeutic potential of PRP in fracture healing, informing future research directions and guiding clinical practice.

Indexed as

bone regenerationclinical outcomesfracture healingmechanisms of actionplatelet-rich plasma (prp)therapeutic potential

Identifiers

PMID39006629
PMCPMC11245593

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.