Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006863›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2023

3D Biological/Biomedical Image Registration with enhanced Feature Extraction and Outlier Detection.

Sahand Hamzehei, Jun Bai, Gianna Raimondi, Rebecca Tripp, Linnaea Ostroff, Sheida Nabavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. PyReconstruct: A fully open-source, collaborative successor to Reconstruct.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. CAPTURE: A Clustered Adaptive Patchwork Technique for Unified Registration Enhancement in Biological Imaging.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sahand HamzeheiUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Jun BaiUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Gianna RaimondiUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Physiology & Neurobiology, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Rebecca TrippUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Physiology & Neurobiology, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Linnaea OstroffUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Physiology & Neurobiology, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Sheida NabaviUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Computer Science & Engineering Department, Storrs, CT, USA.

Funding

A versatile approach for highly multiplexed, high-resolution imaging of endogenous moleculesRF1MH130472 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI OSTROFF, LINNAEA E · 2022 to 2022
$2.2M
New strategies for molecular cell-type labeling in volume electron microscopyRF1MH129269 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI OSTROFF, LINNAEA E · 2022 to 2022
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH129269NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH130472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In various applications, such as computer vision, medical imaging and robotics, three-dimensional (3D) image registration is a significant step. It enables the alignment of various datasets into a single coordinate system, consequently providing a consistent perspective that allows further analysis. By precisely aligning images we can compare, analyze, and combine data collected in different situations. This paper presents a novel approach for 3D or z-stack microscopy and medical image registration, utilizing a combination of conventional and deep learning techniques for feature extraction and adaptive likelihood-based methods for outlier detection. The proposed method uses the Scale-invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and the Residual Network (ResNet50) deep neural learning network to extract effective features and obtain precise and exhaustive representations of image contents. The registration approach also employs the adaptive Maximum Likelihood Estimation SAmple Consensus (MLESAC) method that optimizes outlier detection and increases noise and distortion resistance to improve the efficacy of these combined extracted features. This integrated approach demonstrates robustness, flexibility, and adaptability across a variety of imaging modalities, enabling the registration of complex images with higher precision. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art image registration methods, including conventional SIFT, SIFT with Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC), and Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF (ORB) methods, as well as registration software packages such as bUnwrapJ and TurboReg, in terms of Mutual Information (MI), Phase Congruency-Based (PCB) metrics, and Gradiant-based metrics (GBM), using 3D MRI and 3D serial sections of multiplex microscopy images.

Indexed as

3D biomedical imagesDeep LearningFeature ExtractionImage RegistrationMaximum Likelihood Estimation Sample Consensus (MLESAC)Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT)z-stack Microscopy images

Identifiers

PMID39006863
PMCPMC11246549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.