ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2024
A large-scale CRISPR screen reveals context-specific genetic regulation of retinal ganglion cell regeneration.
Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell death analysis of inducible, titratable neurodegenerative disease models in zebrafish and human stem cell-derived retinal organoids.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Article
- Review
- The microglia-derived protein Sema4ab attenuates regenerative neurogenesis after spinal cord injury in zebrafish.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal-derived neural progenitors underlie localbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cell death modalities modulate inflammatory and regenerative programs in zebrafish sensory organs.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Müller glia-mediated regeneration restores neuronal diversity and retinal circuit organization in the adult zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A single-nucleus RNA sequencing atlas of the postnatal retina of the shark Scyliorhinus canicula.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Damaging effect of ischemia on the development of retinal organoids derived from human embryonic stem cells.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many genes are known to regulate retinal regeneration after widespread tissue damage. Conversely, genes controlling regeneration after limited cell loss, as per degenerative diseases, are undefined. As stem/progenitor cell responses scale to injury levels, understanding how the extent and specificity of cell loss impact regenerative processes is important. Here, transgenic zebrafish enabling selective retinal ganglion cell (RGC) ablation were used to identify genes that regulate RGC regeneration. A single cell multiomics-informed screen of 100 genes identified seven knockouts that inhibited and 11 that promoted RGC regeneration. Surprisingly, 35 out of 36 genes known and/or implicated as being required for regeneration after widespread retinal damage were not required for RGC regeneration. The loss of seven even enhanced regeneration kinetics, including the proneural factors neurog1, olig2 and ascl1a. Mechanistic analyses revealed that ascl1a disruption increased the propensity of progenitor cells to produce RGCs, i.e. increased 'fate bias'. These data demonstrate plasticity in the mechanism through which Müller glia convert to a stem-like state and context specificity in how genes function during regeneration. Increased understanding of how the regeneration of disease-relevant cell types is specifically controlled will support the development of disease-tailored regenerative therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.