ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024
Prediction of disease progression in individuals with subjective cognitive decline using brain network analysis.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and microstructural changes in white and gray matter across the Alzheimer's disease continuum.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- Prediction of disease progression in individuals with subjective cognitive decline using brain network analysis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to explore potential differences in brain functional networks at baseline between individuals with progressive subjective cognitive decline (P-SCD) and stable subjective cognitive decline (S-SCD), as well as to identify potential indicators that can effectively distinguish between P-SCD and S-SCD.
methodsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database was utilized to enroll SCD individuals with a follow-up period of over 3 years. This study included 39 individuals with S-SCD, 15 individuals with P-SCD, and 45 cognitively normal (CN) individuals. Brain functional networks were constructed based on the AAL template, and graph theory analysis was performed to determine the topological properties.
resultsFor global metric, the S-SCD group exhibited stronger small-worldness with reduced connectivity among nearby nodes and accelerated compensatory information transfer capacity. For nodal efficiency, the S-SCD group showed increased connectivity in bilateral posterior cingulate gyri (PCG). However, for nodal local efficiency, the P-SCD group exhibited significantly reduced connectivity in the right cerebellar Crus I compared with the S-SCD group.
conclusionThere are differences in brain functional networks at baseline between P-SCD and S-SCD groups. Furthermore, the right cerebellar Crus I region may be a potentially useful brain area to distinguish between P-SCD and S-SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.