ArticleScientific reports2024
Association between the serum uric acid/serum creatinine ratio and cognitive function in older adults: NHANES in the United States.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Uric Acid on Alzheimer's Disease.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Serum uric acid to creatinine ratio in patients with early-onset post-stroke cognitive impairment: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment can potentially become a significant health concern in older adults. However, early effective diagnostic methods are still lacking. Therefore, we utilized the NHANES database in the US to investigate the relationship between serum uric acid to serum creatinine (SUA/SCR) ratio and cognitive impairment. In our study, a total of 3874 participants were included (2001-2002, 2011-2014). Weighted t tests or chi-square tests were utilized to analyze the basic characteristics of the population. Weighted logistic regression analysis, smooth-fit curves, threshold effects, and subgroup analysis were conducted to investigate the correlation between the SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment. In this study, the SUA/SCR was significantly lower in individuals with cognitive impairment. The logistic regression model, after adjusting for all covariates, revealed that the Q2-Q4 were 0.65 (95% CI 0.49, 0.86), 0.60 (95% CI 0.40, 0.90), 0.55 (95% CI 0.39, 0.77) respectively. This indicates that participants in the Q4 had a 45% reduced risk of cognitive impairment. Smooth-fit curves and threshold effect analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment, with a turning point at 4.13. Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences in the relationship between SUA/SCR and cognitive impairment among different subgroups (P > 0.05). Our findings indicate a negative correlation between the SUA/SCR and the risk of cognitive impairment in the population of adults aged 60 and above in the US. This suggests that the SUA/SCR holds promise as a potential indicator for cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.