Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010056›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2024

CircRNA and lncRNA-associated competing endogenous RNA networks in medulloblastoma: a scoping review.

Fatemeh Nejadi Orang, Mahdi Abdoli Shadbad

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatemeh Nejadi OrangImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mahdi Abdoli ShadbadDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. abdolim@tbzmed.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-8779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedulloblastoma is one of the common primary central nervous system (CNS) malignancies in pediatric patients. The main treatment is surgical resection preceded and/or followed by chemoradiotherapy. However, their serious side effects necessitate a better understanding of medulloblastoma biology to develop novel therapeutic options. MAIN BODY: Circular RNA (circRNA) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) regulate gene expression via microRNA (miRNA) pathways. Although growing evidence has highlighted the significance of circRNA and lncRNA-associated competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks in cancers, no study has comprehensively investigated them in medulloblastoma. For this aim, the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were systematically searched to obtain the relevant papers published before 16 September 2023, adhering to the PRISMA-ScR statement. HOTAIR, NEAT1, linc-NeD125, HHIP-AS1, CRNDE, and TP73-AS1 are the oncogenic lncRNAs, and Nkx2-2as is a tumor-suppressive lncRNA that develop lncRNA-associated ceRNA networks in medulloblastoma. CircSKA3 and circRNA_103128 are upregulated oncogenic circRNAs that develop circRNA-associated ceRNA networks in medulloblastoma.

conclusionIn summary, this study has provided an overview of the existing evidence on circRNA and lncRNA-associated ceRNA networks and their impact on miRNA and mRNA expression involved in various signaling pathways of medulloblastoma. Suppressing the oncogenic ceRNA networks and augmenting tumor-suppressive ceRNA networks can provide ample opportunities for medulloblastoma treatment.

Indexed as

CeRNACircRNALncRNAMedulloblastomaMiRNA

Identifiers

PMID39010056
PMCPMC11251335

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.