ReviewCureus2024
Effectiveness of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Therapy in Alopecia and Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Periorbital Rejuvenation.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Autologous Platelet Concentrates in the Management of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has gained attention in regenerative medicine for its potential to enhance tissue repair and regeneration. Its application in dermatology, particularly for treating alopecia and facilitating facial rejuvenation, is of significant interest but requires systematic evaluation. This review aims to systematically assess the effectiveness of injectable PRF therapy in treating alopecia and facial rejuvenation procedures. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published up to 2023 that involved injectable PRF for alopecia and facial rejuvenation. Eligible studies included prospective cohorts, original studies, case series, and retrospective studies that reported clinical outcomes. Key outcomes were improved hair growth for alopecia and skin texture, elasticity, and appearance for facial rejuvenation. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 130 patients. For alopecia, three studies reported a noticeable improvement in hair density and growth. For facial rejuvenation, four studies demonstrated moderate to significant improvements in skin texture and elasticity and a reduction in facial wrinkles and lines, confirmed by both subjective assessments and objective measurements such as VISIA® skin analysis. Injectable PRF therapy shows promise in treating androgenetic alopecia and enhancing facial esthetics, indicating its potential as an effective treatment option in regenerative dermatology. However, further research involving larger sample sizes, control groups, and longer follow-ups is required to validate these findings and establish standardized treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.