ReviewRheumatology international2024
The emerging paradigm in pediatric rheumatology: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderate-to-substantial agreement of ChatGPT-5 for Kellgren-Lawrence grading on synthetic knee radiographs: a controlled cross-sectional observer agreement study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Tree-based machine learning models recover rule-based flare labels from virtual symptom diaries in pediatric Behçet's disease: an in silico proof-of-concept study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: a cross-sectional Scopus-based analysis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Qualitative study on ethics in paediatric Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) research: perspectives of Turkish legal guardians.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Closed circuit artificial ıntelligence model named morgaf for childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence algorithms, with roots extending into the past but experiencing a resurgence and evolution in recent years due to their superiority over traditional methods and contributions to human capabilities, have begun to make their presence felt in the field of pediatric rheumatology. In the ever-evolving realm of pediatric rheumatology, there have been incremental advancements supported by artificial intelligence in understanding and stratifying diseases, developing biomarkers, refining visual analyses, and facilitating individualized treatment approaches. However, like in many other domains, these strides have yet to gain clinical applicability and validation, and ethical issues remain unresolved. Furthermore, mastering different and novel terminologies appears challenging for clinicians. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature, categorizing algorithms and their applications, thus offering a fresh perspective on the nascent relationship between pediatric rheumatology and artificial intelligence, highlighting both its advancements and constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.