ArticleEndocrine2024
Assessment of potential genetic markers for diabetic foot ulcer among Moscow residents.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- USP30 inhibits wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers by promoting TRAF6-induced ferroptosis and angiogenesis inhibition.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDiabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most severe complications of type 2 diabetes, which is manifested in chronic skin ulcers of lower extremities. DFU treatment remains complex and expensive despite the availability of well-established protocols. Early prediction of potential DFU development at the onset of type 2 diabetes can greatly improve the aftermath of this complication.
methodsTo assess potential genetic markers for DFU, a group of diabetic patients from Moscow region with and without DFU was genotyped for a number of SNPs previously reported to be associated with the DFU.
resultsObtained results did not confirm previously claimed association of rs1024611, rs3918242, rs2073618, rs1800629, rs4986790, rs179998, rs1963645 and rs11549465 (respectively, in MCP1, MMP9, TNFRSF11B, TNFα, TLR4, eNOS, NOS1AP and HIF1α genes) with the DFU. Surprisingly, the t allele of rs7903146 in the TCF7l2 gene known as one of the most prominent risk factors for type 2 diabetes has shown a protective effect on DFU with OR(95%) = 0.68(0.48-0.96).
conclusionNon-replication of previously published SNP associations with DFU suggests that the role of genetic factors in the DFU onset is either highly variable in different populations or is not as significant as the role of non-genetic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39017835What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.