Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018551›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

The Impact of COVID-19 Health Measures on Adults With Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: Cross-Sectional Study.

Riina Bray, Yifan Wang, Nikolas Argiropoulos, Stephanie Robins, John Molot, Marie-Andrée Pigeon, Michel Gaudet, Pierre Auger, Emilie Bélanger, Rohini Peris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Riina BrayEnvironmental Health Clinic, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-9943
Yifan WangAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1881-4799
Nikolas ArgiropoulosAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3952-8675
Stephanie RobinsAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6248-9209
John MolotFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-9410
Marie-Andrée PigeonAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-3019
Michel GaudetAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3019-5478
Pierre AugerAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9418-4108
Emilie BélangerAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-5645
Rohini PerisAssociation pour la santé environnementale du Québec - Environmental Health Association of Québec, Saint Sauveur, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2994-3430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) develops in response to repeated small-level chemical exposures or a major exposure in a subset of people, who then experience symptoms that can range from mild to debilitating when exposed to chemicals. The arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic and the stringent health measures put in place may have increased the burden for those living with MCS, as it became more challenging to avoid chemicals that trigger their condition.

objectiveThis study aimed to better understand the lived experience of Canadians living with MCS during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsAn online questionnaire was created to ask participants to compare daily living during the pandemic to before March 11, 2020. Data were collected in January and February 2021. Three areas were investigated: (1) environmental exposures to chemical triggers from ambient air (pollution from industry, farming, and traffic) and indoor air (the smell of cleaning products, cooking odors, and smoke); (2) access to, and satisfaction with, health care visits; and (3) how people experiencing MCS rated contact with their social network.

resultsIn all, 119 Canadians who had lived with MCS for more than a year completed the questionnaire. The participant sample was mostly female (86.6%, n=103) and highly educated, with 57.1% (n=68) having a university degree. Slightly more than half (57.1%, n=68) were older than 55 years. McNemar chi-square and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to evaluate if there were statistically significant changes before ("prepandemic period") and after ("postpandemic period") March 11, 2020. Perceived exposure to pollution from a highway or a road was significantly decreased from the prepandemic to postpandemic period (z=-3.347; P<.001). Analysis of industry or power plants also suggested a significant decrease in the perceived exposure from the prepandemic to postpandemic period (z=-2.152; P=.04). Participants reported an increase in exposure to odors from disinfectants or sanitizers that entered their living environment (P<.001). There was a significant decrease between prepandemic and postpandemic levels of satisfaction when attending in-person meetings with a physician (z=-2.048; P=.04), yet there were no significant differences between prepandemic and postpandemic levels of satisfaction for online or telephone meetings with a physician. Although people with MCS experienced increased social isolation (P<.001), they also reported an increase in understanding from family (P=.03) and a decrease in stigma for wearing personal protective equipment (P<.001).

conclusionsDuring the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, people with MCS were impacted by inaccessibility, loss of social support, and barriers to accessing health care. This study highlights unique challenges and possible benefits associated with the COVID-19 pandemic public health measures for individuals living with MCS. These findings can guide decision makers to improve policies on accessibility through appropriate accommodation measures.

Indexed as

accessibilityair pollutionair qualityCanadaCOVID-19environmentenvironmentalhealth careisolationlived experiencemultiple chemical sensitivityphysical environmentpollutionsensitivitysocial interactionsocial isolationsocial network

Identifiers

PMID39018551
PMCPMC11292150

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.