Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39019914›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Eco-evolutionary strategies for relieving carbon limitation under salt stress differ across microbial clades.

Yang Dong, Ruirui Chen, Emily B Graham, Bingqian Yu, Yuanyuan Bao, Xin Li, Xiangwei You, Youzhi Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Taxogenomic and Physiological Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yang DongCollege of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Ruirui ChenCollege of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China. rrchen@njfu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4582-3302
Emily B GrahamEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA, 99352, USA. emily.graham@pnnl.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4623-7076
Bingqian YuCollege of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Yuanyuan BaoCollege of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8396-6166
Xin LiCollege of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Xiangwei YouMarine Agriculture Research Center, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, China.
Youzhi FengCollege of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8519-841X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 41977045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous expansion of saline soils under climate change, understanding the eco-evolutionary tradeoff between the microbial mitigation of carbon limitation and the maintenance of functional traits in saline soils represents a significant knowledge gap in predicting future soil health and ecological function. Through shotgun metagenomic sequencing of coastal soils along a salinity gradient, we show contrasting eco-evolutionary directions of soil bacteria and archaea that manifest in changes to genome size and the functional potential of the soil microbiome. In salt environments with high carbon requirements, bacteria exhibit reduced genome sizes associated with a depletion of metabolic genes, while archaea display larger genomes and enrichment of salt-resistance, metabolic, and carbon-acquisition genes. This suggests that bacteria conserve energy through genome streamlining when facing salt stress, while archaea invest in carbon-acquisition pathways to broaden their resource usage. These findings suggest divergent directions in eco-evolutionary adaptations to soil saline stress amongst microbial clades and serve as a foundation for understanding the response of soil microbiomes to escalating climate change.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaCarbonClimate ChangeMicrobiotaSalt StressSoil MicrobiologyBiological EvolutionGenome, BacterialMetagenomeMetagenomicsPhylogenySalinitySoilCarbonSoil

Identifiers

PMID39019914
PMCPMC11255312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.