Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020329›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Knowledge, attitude, and perception towards COVID-19 vaccinations among the adults in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.

Abakundana Nsenga Ariston Gabriel, Xiao-Yang Wang, Laila Jamil, Mulugeta Shegaze Shimbre, Gerard Bikorimana, Lin Zhao, Wu-Chun Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abakundana Nsenga Ariston GabrielInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Xiao-Yang WangInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Laila JamilInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Mulugeta Shegaze ShimbreDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Gerard BikorimanaSchool of Governance, Development and Society, College of Arts and Social Sciences,University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lin ZhaoInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China. zhaolin1989@sdu.edu.cn.
Wu-Chun CaoInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China. caowuchun@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple vaccinations have received approval for the prevention of the coronavirus illness. Nevertheless, the sluggish vaccination rate is mostly attributed to the general population's limited understanding and unwillingness to accept the use of vaccinations. Thus, it is important to investigate the Rwandan population's knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward COVID-19 vaccines.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 370 participants from 11th to 17th February 2023. Demographic information was gathered, and knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccinations were assessed. A binary logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine the parameters that determine the perception of COVID-19 vaccinations.

resultsThis study included 370 participants. Among them, 85% had good knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines, and 84% had a positive attitude towards them. Additionally, the study had a diverse group, with half of the participants being female and nearly half falling between the ages of 30 and 39. Several key findings emerged through logistic regression analysis. Those aged 30-39 had 1.39 times higher odds of positive perception than 18-28 (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.08-3.24). Participants with a university education were twice as likely to have a positive perception compared to those without an education level (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.30-6.20). Additionally, single individuals were three times more likely to have a positive perception than their married counterparts (OR = 3.39, 95% CI = 1.28-9.09). Vaccinated individuals had twice the odds of positive perception than non-vaccinated individuals (OR = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.01-8.89). Those receiving information from government health institutions were three times more likely to have a positive perception than those who received the information from friends (OR = 3.19, 95% CI = 1.02-12.7). Moreover, employed participants were four times more likely to have a positive perception non-employed individuals (OR = 4.21, 95% CI = 1.48-13.6). Besides, gender and COVID-19 diagnosis did not significantly correlate with positive COVID-19 vaccine perception.

conclusionThe results indicate that the general public in Rwanda has good knowledge, positive attitudes, and a positive perception toward the COVID-19 vaccination, however, some of the participants had some misconceptions towards COVID-19. The findings of this study will be valuable for policymakers and healthcare authorities working to improve vaccination rates.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesAttitudesHealth beliefsKnowledgePerceptionRwandaVaccinationVaccine

Identifiers

PMID39020329
PMCPMC11256467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.