Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020355›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2024

Evaluation of artificial intelligence-powered screening for sexually transmitted infections-related skin lesions using clinical images and metadata.

Nyi N Soe, Zhen Yu, Phyu M Latt, David Lee, Jason J Ong, Zongyuan Ge, Christopher K Fairley, Lei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparative analysis of language models in addressing syphilis-related queries.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nyi N SoeMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Zhen YuSchool of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Phyu M LattMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.
David LeeMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Jason J OngMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Zongyuan GeAugmented Intelligence and Multimodal analytics (AIM) for Health Lab, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Christopher K FairleyMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Lei ZhangMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia. lei.zhang1@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-084X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexually transmitted infections (STIs) pose a significant global public health challenge. Early diagnosis and treatment reduce STI transmission, but rely on recognising symptoms and care-seeking behaviour of the individual. Digital health software that distinguishes STI skin conditions could improve health-seeking behaviour. We developed and evaluated a deep learning model to differentiate STIs from non-STIs based on clinical images and symptoms.

methodsWe used 4913 clinical images of genital lesions and metadata from the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre collected during 2010-2023. We developed two binary classification models to distinguish STIs from non-STIs: (1) a convolutional neural network (CNN) using images only and (2) an integrated model combining both CNN and fully connected neural network (FCN) using images and metadata. We evaluated the model performance by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and assessed metadata contributions to the Image-only model.

resultsOur study included 1583 STI and 3330 non-STI images. Common STI diagnoses were syphilis (34.6%), genital warts (24.5%) and herpes (19.4%), while most non-STIs (80.3%) were conditions such as dermatitis, lichen sclerosis and balanitis. In both STI and non-STI groups, the most frequently observed groups were 25-34 years (48.6% and 38.2%, respectively) and heterosexual males (60.3% and 45.9%, respectively). The Image-only model showed a reasonable performance with an AUC of 0.859 (SD 0.013). The Image + Metadata model achieved a significantly higher AUC of 0.893 (SD 0.018) compared to the Image-only model (p < 0.01). Out of 21 metadata, the integration of demographic and dermatological metadata led to the most significant improvement in model performance, increasing AUC by 6.7% compared to the baseline Image-only model.

conclusionsThe Image + Metadata model outperformed the Image-only model in distinguishing STIs from other skin conditions. Using it as a screening tool in a clinical setting may require further development and evaluation with larger datasets.

Indexed as

MetadataSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdultArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSkin DiseasesYoung AdultArtificial intelligence, Sexually transmitted infections, Clinical image classification

Identifiers

PMID39020355
PMCPMC11256573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.