Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39021256›Full record

SynthesisJournal of experimental botany2024

Greater aperture counteracts effects of reduced stomatal density on water use efficiency: a case study on sugarcane and meta-analysis.

Daniel Lunn, Baskaran Kannan, Amandine Germon, Alistair Leverett, Tom E Clemente, Fredy Altpeter, Andrew D B Leakey

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of experimental botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of climate-driven changes in temperature on stomatal anatomy and physiology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Stomata: custodians of leaf gaseous exchange.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel LunnCarl R. Woese, Institute of Genomic Biology, 1206 W. Gregory Drive, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-1568
Baskaran KannanAgronomy Department, 3105 McCarty Hall B, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3082-9963
Amandine GermonCarl R. Woese, Institute of Genomic Biology, 1206 W. Gregory Drive, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8687-294X
Alistair LeverettCarl R. Woese, Institute of Genomic Biology, 1206 W. Gregory Drive, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-1917
Tom E ClementeDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, 202 Keim Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-852X
Fredy AltpeterAgronomy Department, 3105 McCarty Hall B, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0894-4976
Andrew D B LeakeyCarl R. Woese, Institute of Genomic Biology, 1206 W. Gregory Drive, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6251-024X

Funding

Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts InnovationU.S. Department of EnergyU.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program DE-SC0018420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomata regulate CO2 and water vapor exchange between leaves and the atmosphere. Stomata are a target for engineering to improve crop intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE). One example is by expressing genes that lower stomatal density (SD) and reduce stomatal conductance (gsw). However, the quantitative relationship between reduced SD, gsw, and the mechanisms underlying it is poorly understood. We addressed this knowledge gap using low-SD sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) as a case study alongside a meta-analysis of data from 10 species. Transgenic expression of EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 2 from Sorghum bicolor (SbEPF2) in sugarcane reduced SD by 26-38% but did not affect gsw compared with the wild type. Further, no changes occurred in stomatal complex size or proxies for photosynthetic capacity. Measurements of gas exchange at low CO2 concentrations that promote complete stomatal opening to normalize aperture size between genotypes were combined with modeling of maximum gsw from anatomical data. These data suggest that increased stomatal aperture is the only possible explanation for maintaining gsw when SD is reduced. Meta-analysis across C3 dicots, C3 monocots, and C4 monocots revealed that engineered reductions in SD are strongly correlated with lower gsw (r2=0.60-0.98), but this response is damped relative to the change in anatomy.

Indexed as

Plant StomataSaccharumWaterPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant TranspirationWaterEpidermal patterningepidermal patterning factorstomatal conductancestomatal densitywater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID39021256
PMCPMC11565199

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.