ArticleHeliyon2024
A clustering mining method for sports behavior characteristics of athletes based on the ant colony optimization.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and user satisfaction of an online cell morphology self-study and self-test platform on blood smear diagnostic skills.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to enhance the precision of analyzing athlete behavior characteristics, thereby optimizing sports training and competitive strategies. This study introduces an innovative Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) clustering model designed to address the high-dimensional clustering issues in athlete behavior data by simulating the path selection mechanism of ants searching for food. The development process of this model includes fine-tuning ACO parameters, optimizing for features specific to sports data, and comparing it with traditional clustering algorithms, and similar research models based on the neural network, support vector machines, and deep learning. The results indicate that the ACO model significantly outperforms the comparison algorithms in terms of silhouette coefficient (0.72) and Davies-Bouldin index (1.05), demonstrating higher clustering effectiveness and model stability. Particularly noteworthy is the recall rate (0.82), a key performance indicator, where the ACO model accurately captures different behavioral characteristics of athletes, validating its effectiveness and reliability in athlete behavior analysis. The innovation lies not only in the application of the ACO algorithm to address practical issues in the field of sports but also in showcasing the advantages of the ACO algorithm in handling complex, high-dimensional sports data. However, its generality and efficiency on a larger scale or different types of sports data still need further validation. In conclusion, through the introduction and optimization of the ACO clustering model, this study provides a novel and effective approach for a deeper understanding and analysis of athlete behavior characteristics. This study holds significant importance in advancing sports science research and practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.