Multiparametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of uterine fibroids for prediction of growth rate-a pilot study.

Background: Uterine fibroid (UF) growth rate and future morbidity cannot be predicted. This can lead to sub-optimal clinical management, with women being lost to follow-up and later presenting with severe disease that may require hospitalization, transfusions, and urgent surgical interventions. Multi-parametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could provide a biomarker to predict growth rate facilitating better-informed disease management and better clinical outcomes. We assessed the ability of putative quantitative and qualitative MRI predictive factors to predict UF growth rate. Methods: Twenty women with UFs were recruited and completed baseline and follow-up MRI exams, 1-2.5 years apart. The subjects filled out symptom severity and health-related quality of life questionnaires at each visit. A standard clinical pelvic MRI non-contrast exam was performed at each visit, followed by a contrast-enhanced multi-parametric quantitative MRI (mp-qMRI) exam with T2, T2*, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Up to 3 largest fibroids were identified and outlined on the T2-weighted sequence. Fibroid morphology and enhancement patterns were qualitatively assessed on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The UFs' volumes and average T2, T2*, and ADC values were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between UF growth rate and T2, T2*, ADC, and baseline volume. Multiple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to predict fast-growing UFs using combinations of up to 2 significant predictors. A significance level of alpha =0.05 was used. Results: Forty-four fibroids in 20 women had growth rate measurement available, and 36 fibroids in 16 women had follow-up quantitative MRI available. The distribution of fibroid growth rate was skewed, with approximately 20% of the fibroids exhibiting fast growth (>10 cc/year). However, there were no significant changes in median baseline and follow-up values of symptom severity and health-related quality of life scores. There was no change in average T2, T2*, and ADC at follow-up exams and there was a moderate to strong correlation to the fibroid growth rate in baseline volume and average T2 and ADC in slow-growing fibroids (<10 cc/year). A multiple logistic regression to identify fast growing UFs (>10 cc/year) achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 with specificity of 69% at 100% sensitivity. Conclusions: The mp-qMRI parameters T2, ADC, and UF volume obtained at the time of initial fibroid diagnosis may be able to predict UF growth rate. Mp-qMRI could be integrated into the management of UFs, for individualized care and improved clinical outcomes.