ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Nursing Faculty Members' Knowledge Toward Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency nurses' perspectives on integrating a research innovation curriculum into clinical education: a qualitative study of attitudes, needs, and challenges.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nursing Educators' Perceptions of AI in Research: Risks and Benefits.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim In the context of contributing to healthcare and the well-being of a nation and its communities, nursing research plays a vital role in advancing the discipline of nursing science. Nursing research is essential for improving the quality of nursing care. This study aims to examine the research knowledge level of faculty members at the College of Nursing, University of Raparin, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 43 nursing faculty members at the University of Raparin. The survey was distributed using convenience sampling in April 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (released 2019, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Continuous variables were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables were analyzed using frequency and percentage distributions. The association between knowledge scores and demographics was tested using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and post-hoc tests. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to determine the variables that influence the knowledge score. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results A total of 43 participants were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 32.56 ± 4.75, with 69.8% of participants being male. In terms of educational attainment, 48.8% held master's degrees, 39.5% held bachelor's degrees, and only 11% possessed PhDs. The mean work experience was 5.40 ± 4.04 years, and the mean knowledge score toward research was 3.09 ± 1.97 out of 7. Demographic variables, such as age, marital status, and gender, showed no significant associations with knowledge levels (p > 0.05). However, significant associations were found for education level (p = 0.004) and years of experience (p = 0.011). In the stepwise regression analysis, we observed a significant positive correlation between the level of education and knowledge score (F =10.787, p = 0.002). However, variables, such as age, gender, marital status, years of experience, and participation in research courses, did not demonstrate statistical significance (p-values > 0.05). Conclusion This study highlights a significant lack of research expertise among nursing faculty members, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted interventions and instructional activities in nursing education programs. It is crucial to address this knowledge gap in order to support the professional growth of faculty members and promote the advancement of nursing research and evidence-based practice. Policymakers should also consider implementing mentorship programs that strategically pair less experienced faculty members with seasoned researchers. This initiative aims to cultivate a collaborative learning environment and enhance research skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.