ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Learning-based distortion correction enables proximal-scanning endoscopic OCT elastography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proximal rotary scanning is predominantly used in the clinical practice of endoscopic and intravascular OCT, mainly because of the much lower manufacturing cost of the probe compared to distal scanning. However, proximal scanning causes severe beam stability issues (also known as non-uniform rotational distortion, NURD), which hinders the extension of its applications to functional imaging, such as OCT elastography (OCE). In this work, we demonstrate the abilities of learning-based NURD correction methods to enable the imaging stability required for intensity-based OCE. Compared with the previous learning-based NURD correction methods that use pseudo distortion vectors for model training, we propose a method to extract real distortion vectors from a specific endoscopic OCT system, and validate its superiority in accuracy under both convolutional-neural-network- and transformer-based learning architectures. We further verify its effectiveness in elastography calculations (digital image correlation and optical flow) and the advantages of our method over other NURD correction methods. Using the air pressure of a balloon catheter as a mechanical stimulus, our proximal-scanning endoscopic OCE could effectively differentiate between areas of varying stiffness of atherosclerotic vascular phantoms. Compared with the existing endoscopic OCE methods that measure only in the radial direction, our method could achieve 2D displacement/strain distribution in both radial and circumferential directions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.