ArticleASN neuro2024
Diverse Responses of Oligodendrocytes to Different FGF-Family Members: Uncoupling Structure-Function Relationship Within FGF Subfamilies.
Article in ASN neuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oligodendrocyte: Development, Plasticity, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Therapeutic Targets.MedComm · 2026Review
- Interplay Between Aging and Glial Cell Dysfunction: Implications for CNS Health.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cordycepin Activates Autophagy to Suppress FGF9-induced TM3 Mouse Leydig Progenitor Cell Proliferation.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fifteen canonical paracrine fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are organized in five subfamilies that interact with four FGF-receptors (FGFRs) and heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) co-receptors. Many of these FGFs are expressed in CNS regions where oligodendrocyte (OL) progenitors originate, migrate or differentiate. FGF2 (basic FGF) is considered a prototype FGF and the information about the effects of FGF signaling on OL-lineage cells has evolved largely from the study of FGF2. However, other FGFs from four subfamilies ((FGF1 (FGF1,-2), FGF4 (FGF4,-5,-6), FGF8 (FGF8,-17,-18) and FGF9 (FGF9,-16,-20)) that can interact with the isoforms of FGFRs expressed in OL-lineage cells may also play important roles. We previously reported OL-responses to FGF8 family members. Here, we investigate the effects of members of the FGF1,-4, and -9 subfamilies on proliferation and differentiation of OL progenitors (OPCs), and on cell cycle re-entry and down-regulation of myelin proteins by mature OLs. We found that while FGF2 induced all these responses strongly, FGF4,-6,-9 could do so only transiently and in the presence of exogenous HSPGs, and that FGF5,-16,-20 could not do so even in the presence of heparin or at higher concentrations. Furthermore, we noted that structurally similar FGFs within subfamilies did not always show similarities in their biological effects on OL-lineage cells. Taken together, these studies reveal that FGFs differ in the way they regulate the OL-lineage cells, emphasizes the selectivity and importance of HSPGs as FGF co-receptors in OL-lineage cells and suggests that structural similarity among FGF-subfamily members may not always predict their overlapping biological functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.