ArticleJournal of diabetes and its complications2024
Sex differences in association of joint glycemic, blood pressure and lipid control and two-year risk of falls among older adults with diabetes.
Article in Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Pathways Linking Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Osteoarthritis to Falls in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo characterize the risk of falls among males and females by joint glycemic, blood pressure (BP) and cholesterol control among older adults (≥65 years) with diagnosed diabetes in USA.
methodsUsing longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (2006-2019), we studied the association of joint glycemic (HbA1c < 7.5 %), BP (systolic <140 and diastolic <90 mmHg) and cholesterol (total < 200 mg/dL) control with two-year risk of falls. We estimated risk ratios (RR) to describe the associations for joint ABC control and independent biomarker control by sex, using modified Poisson regressions after adjusting for known individual and household risk factors.
resultsThe analytic sample consisted of 4509 observations from 2829 older adults (54.7 % female) with a mean age of 72.2 (SD: 6.6) years and duration of diabetes of 9.9 years. Joint ABC control was not associated with risk of falls among females but was associated with lower risk among males (0.91 [95%CI: 0.81-1.02]). Furthermore, achievement of glycemic control (0.85 [95%CI: 0.73-0.98]) and BP control (0.89 [95%CI: 0.79-1.01]) were associated with lower risk but cholesterol control (1.15 [95%CI: 0.99, 1.34]) was associated with higher risk of falls among males.
conclusionsJoint achievement of glycemic, BP and cholesterol targets may prevent falls among older males. Future studies among people with diabetes should consider biomarker control as a preventive factor for falls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.