Observational studyPediatric research2025
Two risk assessment models for predicting white matter injury in extremely preterm infants.
Observational study in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtremely preterm infants (EPIs) are at high-risk of white matter injury (WMI), leading to long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. We aimed to develop nomograms for WMI.
methodsThe study included patients from 31 provinces, spanning ten years. 6074 patients before 2018 were randomly divided into a training and internal validation group (7:3). The external validation group comprised 1492 patients from 2019. Predictors were identified using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariable logistic regression and nomograms were constructed. Models' performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves.
resultsThe prenatal nomogram included multiple gestation, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), chorioamnionitis, prenatal glucocorticoids, hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) and Apgar 1 min, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.805, 0.816 and 0.799 in the training, internal validation and external validation group, respectively. Days of mechanical ventilation (MV), shock, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) ligation, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade III-IV, septicemia, hypothermia and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) stage II-III were identified as postpartum predictors. The AUCs were 0.791, 0.813 and 0.823 in the three groups, respectively. DCA and calibration curves showed good clinical utility and consistency.
conclusionThe two nomograms provide clinicians with precise and efficient tools for prediction of WMI. IMPACT: This study is a large-sample multicenter study, spanning 10 years. The two nomograms are convenient for identifying high-risk infants early, allowing for reducing poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39025934What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.