Evidence mapPaperPMID 39026558Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2024

Assessing the state of obesity care: Quality, access, guidelines, and standards.

Lee M Kaplan, Caroline M Apovian, Jamy D Ard, David B Allison, Louis J Aronne, Rachel L Batterham, Luca Busetto, Dror Dicker, Deborah B Horn, Aaron S Kelly and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lee M KaplanObesity, Metabolism and Nutrition Institute Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-2696
Caroline M ApovianDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Weight Management Nutrition and Weight Management Center Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-1922
Jamy D ArdDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-6795
David B AllisonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington Bloomington Indiana USA.
Louis J AronneDepartment of Medicine Weill-Cornell College of Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-9401
Rachel L BatterhamDepartment of Medicine Centre for Obesity Research Rayne Institute University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5477-8585
Luca BusettoDepartment of Medicine University of Padova Padova Italy.
Dror DickerDepartment of Internal Medicine D Haharon Hospital Rabin Medical Center Sackler School of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel.
Deborah B HornCenter for Obesity Medicine and Metabolic Performance University of Texas McGovern Medical School Houston Texas USA.
Aaron S KellyDepartment of Pediatrics and Center for Pediatric Obesity Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Jeffrey I MechanickMarie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health at Mount Sinai Heart New York New York USA.
Jonathan Q PurnellDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition Knight Cardiovascular Institute Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Ximena Ramos-SalasObesity Canada Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Assessing the State of Obesity Care Writing Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An international panel of obesity medicine experts from multiple professional organizations examined patterns of obesity care and current obesity treatment guidelines to identify areas requiring updating in response to emerging science and clinical evidence. Aims: The panel focused on multiple medical health and societal issues influencing effective treatment of obesity and identified several unmet needs in the definition, assessment, and care of obesity. Methods: The panel was held in Leesburg, Virginia in September 2019. Results: The panelists recommended addressing these unmet needs in obesity medicine through research, education, evaluation of delivery and payment of care, and updating clinical practice guidelines (CPG) to better reflect obesity's pathophysiological basis and heterogeneity, as well as the disease's health, sociocultural, and economic complications; effects on quality of life; need for standards for quantitative comparison of treatment benefits, risks, and costs; and the need to more effectively integrate obesity treatment guidelines into routine clinical practice and to facilitate more direct clinician participation to improve public understanding of obesity as a disease with a pathophysiological basis. The panel also recommended that professional organizations working to improve the care of people with obesity collaborate via a working group to develop an updated, patient-focused, comprehensive CPG establishing standards of care, addressing identified needs, and providing for routine, periodic review and updating. Conclusions: Unmet needs in the definition, assessment and treatment of obesity were identified and a blueprint to address these needs developed via a clinical practice guideline that can be utilized worldwide to respond to the increasing prevalence of obesity.

Indexed as

obesity careobesity treatment guidelinesstandards of care

Identifiers

PMID39026558
PMCPMC11255038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.