ArticleHeliyon2024
Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines for tension-type headache: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Core Outcome Set Development for Tension-Type Headache Treatment Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The high incidence of Tension-type headache (TTH) has led to significant social and economic challenges. Given the widespread use of Chinese patent medicines (CPM) for TTH patients, this study aim to evaluate the efficacy of different CPMs in treating TTH by network meta-analysis. Methods: Eight databases were conducted to identify CPMs-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from database inception date to August 2023. The primary outcome was clinical efficiency rate. The secondary outcomes were numerical rating scale (NRS), frequency of headache, duration of headache, hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), hamilton depression Scale (HAMD) and adverse reactions. ROB 2.0 were used for quality evaluation. Stata 15.1 and R 3.5.3 software were used for Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results: A total of forty-one RCTs were included, involving 3,996 patients and 8 CPMs. The network meta-analysis revealed that Shugan Jieyu capsule plus western medicine (WM) was the best choice of CPM for improving clinical efficiency rate [vs. WM: relative risk (RR) = 7.31, 95 % confidence interval (CI): (1.65, 56.71)]. Yangxue Qingnao granule plus WM was superior to other therapeutic combinations in reducing duration of headache [vs. WM: MD = 1.05, 95%CI(0.74, 1.40)]. Jieyu pill plus WM might have best effect in reducing HAMD [vs. WM: MD = 7.15, 95%CI(-3.77, 18.14)], HAMA scores [vs. WM: MD = -7.41, 95%CI(-13.39, -1.42)], and NRS scores [vs. WM: mean difference (MD) = 2.01, 95%CI(1.47, 2.55)]. In terms of the frequency of headache, although Yangxue Qingnao granule plus WM and Toutong-ning capsule plus WM performed best, the optimal CPMs in reducing the frequency of headache remain to be further explored. Furthermore, due to the limited safety evidence available, reliable safety conclusions could not be drawn. Conclusion: CPM can effectively improve headache symptoms, clinical efficiency, and quality of life in patients with TTH. However, research with high quality and large sample sizes is needed for further investigation due to the limitations of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.