ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Association of serum resolvin D1 with the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeResolvin D1 (RvD1) inhibits inflammation, reduces oxidative stress, and forecasts the risk of cardiovascular events, but relevant evidence in hemodialysis patients is lacking. This study intended to investigate the predictive value of RvD1 for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk in hemodialysis patients.
methodsTotally, 252 patients who underwent hemodialysis were included. Serum RvD1 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were followed up with a median of 12.1 months. MACE was recorded during the follow-up period.
resultsRvD1 was inversely correlated with diabetes history (P = 0.002), cardiac troponin T (TnT) (P = 0.029), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (P < 0.001) in hemodialysis patients. 25 hemodialysis patients experienced MACE. RvD1 was reduced in hemodialysis patients with MACE versus those without MACE (P = 0.004). RvD1 exhibited a certain value in forecasting MACE risk, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.675 [95% confidence interval CI: 0.565-0.786]. Increased RvD1 cut by median (P = 0.043) and cut by quartile (P = 0.042) were related to decreased accumulating MACE in hemodialysis patients. Moreover, RvD1 independently predicted declined MACE risk [odds ratio (OR) = 0.644, P = 0.045], but age (OR = 1.048, P = 0.039) and TnT (OR = 1.006, P = 0.005) independently predicted ascended MACE risk in hemodialysis patients. The combination of these independent factors displayed a good value for estimating MACE risk in hemodialysis patients with an AUC of 0.744 (95% CI: 0.640-0.849).
conclusionSerum RvD1 is inversely correlated with diabetes history, TnT, and hsCRP in hemodialysis patients. More importantly, it could serve as a potential marker to predict MACE risk in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39028494What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.