Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028994›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2024

Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: Scoping Review.

Brittany Taylor, Mollie Hobensack, Stephanie Niño de Rivera, Yihong Zhao, Ruth Masterson Creber, Kenrick Cato

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-omics approaches to major psychiatric disorders.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brittany TaylorSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-5215
Mollie HobensackBrookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2852-4175
Stephanie Niño de RiveraSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3862-149X
Yihong ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8730-0476
Ruth Masterson CreberSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4238-9902
Kenrick CatoSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0704-3826

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001875 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SPANN, MARISA N, TAYLOR, JACQUELYN Y · 2016 to 2025
$8.9M
Strengthening Healthcare and Research Engagement through Data Sharing: SHARER01NS123639 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Mario FL Gaudino, Ruth Marie Masterson Creber · 2021 to 2026
$4.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001875NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is one of the most common mental disorders that affects >300 million people worldwide. There is a shortage of providers trained in the provision of mental health care, and the nursing workforce is essential in filling this gap. The diagnosis of depression relies heavily on self-reported symptoms and clinical interviews, which are subject to implicit biases. The omics methods, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and microbiomics, are novel methods for identifying the biological underpinnings of depression. Machine learning is used to analyze genomic data that includes large, heterogeneous, and multidimensional data sets.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to review the existing literature on machine learning methods for omics data analysis to identify individuals with depression, with the goal of providing insight into alternative objective and driven insights into the diagnostic process for depression.

methodsThis scoping review was reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Searches were conducted in 3 databases to identify relevant publications. A total of 3 independent researchers performed screening, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Critical appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies.

resultsThe screening process identified 15 relevant papers. The omics methods included genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, multiomics, and microbiomics, and machine learning methods included random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and artificial neural network.

conclusionsThe findings of this scoping review indicate that the omics methods had similar performance in identifying omics variants associated with depression. All machine learning methods performed well based on their performance metrics. When variants in omics data are associated with an increased risk of depression, the important next step is for clinicians, especially nurses, to assess individuals for symptoms of depression and provide a diagnosis and any necessary treatment.

Indexed as

DepressionMachine LearningEpigenomicsGenomicsHumansdepressionmachine learningmental healthnursesomicsreview

Identifiers

PMID39028994
PMCPMC11297379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.